Texas TRAIGA
Proof that red-state AI regulation looks different — intent-based prohibitions rather than duty-of-care regimes — yet still creates real obligations. With Colorado, it brackets the design space federal preemption fights will test.
What it is
Texas's AI law (effective 1 Jan 2026) takes an intent-based approach: it prohibits developing or deploying AI to unlawfully discriminate, manipulate behavior, or produce CSAM/deepfake abuse, imposes disclosure duties on government AI use, and creates a regulatory sandbox.
Who is affected
Companies deploying AI in Texas; frontier developers and GenAI providers in California; Illinois employers
Key obligations
- Prohibited AI uses: behavioral manipulation, unlawful discrimination (intent-based), certain sexual content
- Government agencies must disclose AI interaction to consumers
- Biometric identifier limits for government; AG enforcement with cure period; sandbox program
Compliance dates
Texas TRAIGA in effect
Texas's Responsible AI Governance Act took effect, alongside California's SB 53 (frontier transparency), AB 2013 (training-data disclosure) and Illinois's AI employment-discrimination law — the largest single wave of US state AI law to date.
Recent signals
Connecticut's AI and online safety law takes effect
Public Act 26-15 and companion privacy amendments took effect, covering AI chatbot disclosures, facial recognition and surveillance pricing.
California enacts SB 574 on lawyers' and arbitrators' use of generative AI
The first state statute on attorney AI use. It bars delegating the practice of law to generative AI and requires lawyers to verify citations and disclose AI use in court filings. Arbitrators may not delegate decisions to AI. It takes effect 1 January 2027.
New York sets frontier developer registration for November
Governor Hochul announced that frontier AI developers must register with the state from November 2026 under the RAISE Act, with full duties from January 2027.
California signs SB 813 and AB 1405 on independent AI verification
Governor Newsom signed the first US laws creating accredited AI verification organisations and standards for AI auditors, calling on the federal government to follow.
Related instruments
- US-STColorado AI ActThe first comprehensive US state AI law, now re-enacted: developers and deployers of AI used in consequential decisions (employmen…
- US-STCalifornia SB 53The first US law regulating frontier AI developers specifically: large developers must publish frontier AI frameworks, report cata…
- US-STCalifornia AB 2013Requires developers of generative AI systems made available in California to publish documentation of training datasets — sources,…
- US-STCalifornia SB 942Requires large GenAI providers (over 1M monthly users) to offer free AI-detection tools and embed latent provenance disclosures in…
- US-STIllinois HB 3773Amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to prohibit employers from using AI that discriminates in recruitment, hiring, promotion or d…